Publius: The Journal of Federalism Advance Access originally published online on July 29, 2008
Publius: The Journal of Federalism 2008 38(4):692-714; doi:10.1093/publius/pjn020
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appears in the following Publius: The Journal of Federalism issue: Attribution of Governmental Blame in Times of Disaster [View the issue table of contents]
Is Federalism the Reason for Policy Failure in Hurricane Katrina?

*North Carolina State University; tom_birkland{at}ncsu.edu, tom.birkland{at}gmail.com
University of North Carolina, School of Government; sjwaterman{at}gmail.com
Governmental responses to Hurricane Katrina are generally cited as policy failures. Media and popular analyses focus on the federal government's policy failures in hazard preparedness, response, and recovery. Meanwhile, disaster experts realize that disaster response is a shared intergovernmental responsibility. We examine the federal nature of natural disaster policy in the US to consider whether federalism, or other factors, had the greatest influence on the failures in Katrina. We find that some policy failures are related to policy design considerations based in federalism, but that the national focus on "homeland security" and the concomitant reduction in attention to natural hazards and disasters, are equally, if not more complicit, in the erosion of government disaster management capacity that was revealed in Hurricane Katrina.